It says "may", hence there is chance of 50% for something to be true always, and a chance of 50% for something to be untrue always. In other words to remove the ambiguity word "may" this can be written as: What is true at times, is not always unseen and is always seen at other times. What is unseen, at times it is not true, and at other times it is true.
After removing the nagations from your sentence it becomes: What is true, may always be seen, but what is unseen may always be false.
Now removing the ambiguity word 'may' and removing negations it becomes: Phrase 1: What is true, is always seen. What is true, is always unseen. but Phrase 2: What is unseen, is always false. What is unseen, is always true.
In conclusion, the phrase negates itself for a general event, the result is zero, and the phrases are useless.
At some specific event, one of the phrase becomes true, and for the same event there is a 50% chance for the second phrase to be true. (as there are two events, in them only one can be true, in an unknown event).
All in all, I have a feeling (according to the calculations in my mind) that there is a higher chance of these phrases to be untrue. And that they are true on the basis of the event and reasoning you had. Hence it means something only to you for that specific event, and for every one else, such an event has to be found to agree with it.
An example for its truthfullness is: Scenario: A pen is lying in front of me that i can see, and there is no cd in its drive, that i cannot see inside of, and i am thinking that there is cd in the drive.
It is true that the pen is lying in front of me and is seen. Hence, it is not always unseen and is true. Unseen is inside of cddrive that has cd(in mind). So it is not true.
Yet, for it falsehood, when I have time I will explain it...
Hope this thinking of mine gives benefit to thoughtfull humans.
10 Comments:
intense..
i like..
what is seen is not the truth
what is the truth can not be seen :D
i like ur better :P hahaha
'we are all waves until or unless perceived by someone'
its odd but beleivable.
good point.
indeed...you are very much right!
you sure got me thinking...
how you been?
Reading this takes you in way too deep.
Sometimes I do wish that what is unseen would be true. It would give a different prespective on things.
darlin hasnt it been a bit too long now...we should move on from"think"....
all that thinking for allt hat time kinda got me messed up ...lol....
so update....!!!
Hello! Havent seen you around in a while! What up?
It says "may", hence there is chance of 50% for something to be true always, and a chance of 50% for something to be untrue always.
In other words to remove the ambiguity word "may" this can be written as:
What is true at times, is not always unseen and is always seen at other times. What is unseen, at times it is
not true, and at other times it is true.
After removing the nagations from your sentence it becomes:
What is true, may always be seen, but
what is unseen may always be false.
Now removing the ambiguity word 'may' and removing negations it becomes:
Phrase 1:
What is true, is always seen.
What is true, is always unseen.
but
Phrase 2:
What is unseen, is always false.
What is unseen, is always true.
In conclusion, the phrase negates itself for a general event, the result is zero, and the phrases are useless.
At some specific event, one of the phrase becomes true, and for the same event there is a 50% chance for the second phrase to be true. (as there are two events, in them only one can be true, in an unknown event).
All in all, I have a feeling (according to the calculations in my mind) that there is a higher chance of these phrases to be untrue. And that they are true on the basis of the event and reasoning you had. Hence it means something only to you for that specific event, and for every one else, such an event has to be found to agree with it.
An example for its truthfullness is:
Scenario: A pen is lying in front of me that i can see, and there is no cd in its drive, that i cannot see inside of, and i am thinking that there is cd in the drive.
It is true that the pen is lying in front of me and is seen. Hence, it is not always unseen and is true.
Unseen is inside of cddrive that has cd(in mind). So it is not true.
Yet, for it falsehood, when I have time I will explain it...
Hope this thinking of mine gives benefit to thoughtfull humans.
Post a Comment
<< Home